Sums of powers via central finite differences and Newton’s formula

Petro Kolosov

2026-01-24

Abstract

In this manuscript, we derive closed-form expressions for multifold sums of powers using Newton’s interpolation formula in central differences, evaluated at an arbitrary integer point \(t\). We further show that Knuth’s formula for multifold sums of odd powers arises naturally from Newton’s interpolation formula in central differences evaluated at zero. Additionally, we provide Wolfram Mathematica programs to validate the main results.

1

Introduction and main results

In this manuscript, we derive formulas for multifold sums of powers using Newton’s formula and central finite differences. The idea of deriving sums of powers using difference operators and Newton series is classical and quite general. Formulas for sums of powers using forward and backward differences can be found in the works (Kolosov 2026a, 2026b). We define the recurrence for multifold sums of powers introduced by Donald Knuth (Knuth, Donald E. 1993), which is used throughout the paper.

Proposition 1 (Multifold sums of powers recurrence). For non-negative integers \(r,n,m\) \[\begin{align*} \Sigma^{0}\,{n}^{m} &= n^m \\ \Sigma^{1}\,{n}^{m} &= \Sigma^{0}\,{1}^{m} + \Sigma^{0}\,{2}^{m} + \cdots + \Sigma^{0}\,{n}^{m} \\ \Sigma^{r+1}\,{n}^{m} &= \Sigma^{r}\,{1}^{m} + \Sigma^{r}\,{2}^{m} + \cdots + \Sigma^{r}\,{n}^{m} \end{align*}\]

Proposition 2 (Central factorials). For integers \(n,k\) \[\begin{align*} n^{[k]} = \begin{cases} 0, \quad & \mathrm{if \; } k < 0, \\ 1, \quad & \mathrm{if \; } k = 0, \\ n \left( n + \frac{k}{2} -1 \right)\left( n + \frac{k}{2} -2 \right) \cdots \left( n - \frac{k}{2} +1 \right) = n \prod_{j=1}^{k-1} \left( n + \frac{k}{2} -j \right), \quad & \mathrm{if \; } k>0. \end{cases} \end{align*}\]

Consider Newton’s interpolation formula (Newton, Isaac and Chittenden, N.W. 1850; Butzer et al. 1989; Steffensen, Johan Frederik 1927) in central differences evaluated at zero.

Proposition 3 (Newton’s formula in central differences at zero). \[\begin{align*} f(x) = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{x^{[k]}}{k!} \delta^{k} f(0), \end{align*}\] where \(\delta^{k} f(0) = \sum_{j=0}^{k} (-1)^{j} \binom{k}{j} f\left(\frac{k}{2} - j\right)\) are central finite differences at zero, and \(x^{[k]}\) are central factorials, with \(x^{[0]}=1\) for every \(x\).

We observe that central factorials are closely related to falling factorials \(\left(x\right)_{n} = x(x-1)(x-2)(x-3)\cdots(x-n+1)=\prod_{k=0}^{n-1}(x-k)\). Therefore,

Proposition 4 (Central factorials in terms of falling). For integers \(n,k\) \[\begin{align*} n^{[k]} = \begin{cases} 0, \quad & \mathrm{if \; } k<0 \\ 1, \quad & \mathrm{if \; } k=0 \\ n \left(n+\frac{k}{2}-1\right)_{k-1}, \quad & \mathrm{if \; } k>0 \end{cases} \end{align*}\] where \(\left(n+\frac{k}{2}-1\right)_{k-1}\) are falling factorials.

To derive a formula for multifold sums of powers, we follow the strategy to express the Newton’s formula [prop:newtons-formula-in-central-differences] in terms of binomial coefficients, then to reach closed forms of column sum of binomial coefficients by means of hockey stick identity. Therefore,

Proposition 5 (Binomial form of central factorials). For integers \(n\) and \(k \geq 1\) \[\begin{align*} \frac{n^{[k]}}{k!} = \frac{n}{k} \binom{n+\frac{k}{2}-1}{k-1} \end{align*}\]

Proof. We have \[\begin{align*} \frac{n^{[k]}}{k!} &= \frac{n}{k!}\left(n+\frac{k}{2}-1\right)_{k-1} = \frac{n}{k (k-1)!} \left(n+\frac{k}{2}-1\right)_{k-1} = \frac{n}{k} \binom{n+\frac{k}{2}-1}{k-1} \end{align*}\] because of the identity in falling factorial \(\frac{\left(x\right)_{n}}{n!} = \binom{x}{n}\), and Proposition [prop:central-factorials-in-terms-of-falling]. ◻

This yields Newton’s formula for powers, in terms of central differences.

Proposition 6 (Newton’s formula for powers at zero). For positive integers \(n \geq 1\) and \(m \geq 1\) \[\begin{align*} n^m = \sum_{k=1}^{m} \frac{n}{k} \binom{n+\frac{k}{2}-1}{k-1} \delta^{k} 0^m \end{align*}\]

Although it is based on Newton’s interpolation formula [prop:newtons-formula-in-central-differences], Proposition [prop:newtons-formula-for-powers-in-zero] starts the summation at \(k=1\), which avoids division by zero in \(\frac{n}{k}\). This is a valid trick, because the central difference \(\delta^{k} 0^n\) is zero for all \(n \geq 1\) and \(k=0\). By factoring out and simplifying the term \(n\), we get \[\begin{align*} n^{m-1} = \sum_{k=1}^{m} \frac{1}{k} \binom{n+\frac{k}{2}-1}{k-1} \delta^{k} 0^m \end{align*}\] We observe that the central finite difference operator \(\delta^{k} 0^m\) depends on the parity of \(m\) and \(k\). In particular, \[\begin{align*} \delta^{k} 0^m \neq 0 \quad &\text{when} \quad m \equiv k \pmod{2}, \\ \delta^{k} 0^m = 0 \quad &\text{when} \quad m \not\equiv k \pmod{2}. \end{align*}\] Thus, for odd powers, only even-order central differences contribute. By setting \(m \rightarrow 2m\), we get, \[\begin{align*} n^{2m-1} = \sum_{k=1}^{2m} \frac{1}{k} \binom{n+\frac{k}{2}-1}{k-1} \delta^{k} 0^{2m}. \end{align*}\] Since \(k\) runs over all integers in the range \(0\leq k \leq 2m\), we can omit odd values of \(k\). \[\begin{align*} n^{2m-1} = \sum_{k=1}^{m} \frac{1}{2k} \binom{n+k-1}{2k-1} \delta^{2k} 0^{2m} \end{align*}\] Hence, we obtain the formula for ordinary sums of odd powers.

Proposition 7 (Ordinary sums of odd powers in central differences). For integers \(n\geq 1, \; m\geq 1\) \[\begin{align*} \Sigma^{1}\,{n}^{2m-1} = \sum_{k=1}^{m} \frac{1}{2k} \binom{n+k}{2k} \delta^{2k} 0^{2m} \end{align*}\]

Proof. We have \(\Sigma^{1}\,{n}^{2m-1} = \sum_{k=1}^{m} \frac{1}{2k} \delta^{2k} 0^{2m} \sum_{j=1}^{n} \binom{j+k-1}{k-1}\).

By hockey stick identity \(\sum_{j=1}^{n} \binom{j+k-1}{2k-1} = \binom{n+k}{2k}\), thus the statement follows. ◻

Therefore,

Theorem 8 (Multifold sums of odd powers in central differences). For integers \(n,m,r\geq0\), \[\begin{align*} \Sigma^{r}\,{n}^{2m-1} = \sum_{k=1}^{m} \frac{1}{2k} \binom{n+k-1+r}{2k-1+r} \delta^{2k} 0^{2m}. \end{align*}\]

Proof. We have \(\Sigma^{1}\,{n}^{2m-1} = \sum_{k=1}^{m} \frac{1}{2k} \delta^{2k} 0^{2m} \sum_{j=1}^{n} \binom{j+k-1}{2k-1}\).

By hockey stick identity \(\sum_{j=1}^{n} \binom{j+k-1}{k-1} = \binom{n+k}{2k}\). By induction the claim follows. ◻

It is quite interesting to notice that the formula for sums of odd-powers \(n^{2m-1}\) given by Donald Knuth in Johann Faulhaber and sums of powers (Knuth, Donald E. 1993) recovers naturally from the theorem [theorem:multifold-sums-of-odd-powers-in-central-differences]. The reason is straightforward, instead of using central factorial numbers of the second kind \(T(n,k)\), the theorem [theorem:multifold-sums-of-odd-powers-in-central-differences] utilizes central differences explicitly, because,

Lemma 9 (Central factorial numbers of the second kind). For integers \(n \geq 0, \; k\geq 0\), \[\begin{align*} k! T(n, k) = \delta^k 0^n, \end{align*}\] where \(T(n,k)\) are central factorial numbers, defined by polynomial identity, \[\begin{align*} x^m = \sum_{k=1}^{m} T(m,k) x^{[k]}. \end{align*}\] See (Riordan 1968, 213), and (Carlitz and Riordan 1963).

It means that Knuth’s formula for sums of odd powers,

Proposition 10 (Multifold sums of odd powers in central factorial numbers). For integers \(n \geq 1, \; m \geq 1\) and \(r\geq0\) \[\begin{align*} \Sigma^{r}\,{n}^{2m-1} = \sum_{k=1}^{m} (2k-1)! \binom{n+k-1+r}{2k-1+r} T(2m,2k). \end{align*}\]

originates from Newton’s interpolation formula in central differences [prop:newtons-formula-in-central-differences]. The non-zero central factorial numbers \(T(2m,2k)\) is the sequence A008957 in the OEIS (Sloane, Neil J.A. and others 2003). For example, \[\begin{align*} \Sigma^{1}\,{n}^{1} &= \tbinom{n+1}{2}, \\ \Sigma^{1}\,{n}^{3} &= 6 \tbinom{n+2}{4} + \tbinom{n+1}{2}, \\ \Sigma^{1}\,{n}^{5} &= 120 \tbinom{n+3}{6} + 30 \tbinom{n+2}{4} + \tbinom{n+1}{2}, \\ \Sigma^{1}\,{n}^{7} &= 5040 \tbinom{n+4}{8} + 1680 \tbinom{n+3}{6} + 126 \tbinom{n+2}{4} + \tbinom{n+1}{2}. \end{align*}\] While multifold sums of odd powers are, \[\begin{align*} \Sigma^{r}\,{n}^{1} &= \tbinom{n+1+r}{2+r}, \\ \Sigma^{r}\,{n}^{3} &= 6 \tbinom{n+2+r}{4+r} + \tbinom{n+1+r}{2+r}, \\ \Sigma^{r}\,{n}^{5} &= 120 \tbinom{n+3+r}{6+r} + 30 \tbinom{n+2+r}{4+r} + \tbinom{n+1+r}{2+r}, \\ \Sigma^{r}\,{n}^{7} &= 5040 \tbinom{n+4+r}{8+r} + 1680 \tbinom{n+3+r}{6+r} + 126 \tbinom{n+2+r}{4+r} + \tbinom{n+1+r}{2+r}. \end{align*}\] The coefficients \(1, 6, 1, 120, 30, 1,\ldots\) is the sequence A303675 in the OEIS (Sloane, Neil J.A. and others 2003). This approach can be generalized even further. Consider Newton’s interpolation formula around an arbitrary integer \(t\).

Proposition 11 (Newton’s interpolation formula in central differences). \[\begin{align*} f(x+t) = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{x^{[k]}}{k!} \delta^{k} f(t) \end{align*}\]

Proof. See (Butzer et al. 1989, 462). ◻

Thus, for powers we have identity,

Proposition 12 (Newton’s formula for powers). For integers \(n,m \geq 0\), and an arbitrary integer \(t\), \[\begin{align*} n^m = \sum_{k=0}^{m} \frac{(n-t)^{[k]}}{k!} \delta^{k} t^m \end{align*}\]

Thus,

Proposition 13 (Powers in central binomial form). For integers \(n,t\) and \(m \geq 0\) \[\begin{align*} n^m &= \frac{(n-t)^{[0]}}{0!} \delta^{0} t^m + \sum_{k=1}^{m} \frac{n-t}{k} \binom{n+t+\frac{k}{2}-1}{k-1} \delta^{k} t^m \\ &= t^m + \sum_{k=1}^{m} (n-t) \binom{n-t+\frac{k}{2}-1}{k-1} \frac{\delta^{k} t^m}{k} \end{align*}\]

Now we expand the brackets in central binomial form above, \[\begin{align*} n^m = t^m + \sum_{k=1}^{m} \frac{\delta^{k} t^m}{k} \left[ n \binom{n-t+\frac{k}{2}-1}{k-1} - t \binom{n-t+\frac{k}{2}-1}{k-1} \right]. \end{align*}\] Hence, we get the formula for ordinary sums of powers.

Corollary 14 (Centered ordinary sums of powers). For integers \(t, \; m\geq 0, \; n \geq 0\), \[\begin{align*} \Sigma^{1}\,{n}^{m} = \sum_{j=1}^n t^m + \sum_{k=1}^{m} \frac{\delta^{k} t^m}{k} \left[ \sum_{j=1}^n j \binom{j-t+\frac{k}{2}-1}{k-1} - t \sum_{j=1}^n \binom{j-t+\frac{k}{2}-1}{k-1} \right] \end{align*}\]

Now we notice that,

Proposition 15 (Binomial decomposition). For integers \(n\geq 0, \; r \geq 0, \; m\geq 0\), \[\begin{align*} n \binom{n+r}{m} = (m+1) \binom{n+r}{m+1} - (r-m) \binom{n+r}{m}. \end{align*}\]

Proof. By expanding the brackets yields, \[\begin{align*} &n \tbinom{n+r}{m} = (m+1) \tbinom{n+r}{m+1} - (r-m) \tbinom{n+r}{m} \\ &= m \tbinom{n+r}{m+1} + \tbinom{n+r}{m+1} - r \tbinom{n+r}{m} + m \tbinom{n+r}{m}. \end{align*}\] Recall the extraction property of binomial coefficients, that is, \[\begin{align*} \tbinom{n}{k+1} = \tfrac{n-k}{k+1} \tbinom{n}{k}. \end{align*}\] Now we can notice that, \[\begin{align*} \tbinom{n+r}{m+1} = \tfrac{n+r-m}{m+1} \tbinom{n+r}{m}, \end{align*}\] by extraction. Thus, \[\begin{align*} n \tbinom{n+r}{m} &= m \tfrac{n+r-m}{m+1} \tbinom{n+r}{m} + \tfrac{n+r-m}{m+1} \tbinom{n+r}{m} - r \tbinom{n+r}{m} + m \tbinom{n+r}{m}. \end{align*}\] By moving binomial coefficient \(\binom{n+r}{m}\) out of the brackets, we get, \[\begin{align*} n \tbinom{n+r}{m} &= \tbinom{n+r}{m} \left[ m \tfrac{n+r-m}{m+1} + \tfrac{n+r-m}{m+1} - r + m \right] \\ &= \tbinom{n+r}{m} \left[ (m+1) \tfrac{n+r-m}{m+1} - r + m \right] \\ &= n \tbinom{n+r}{m}. \end{align*}\] This completes the proof. ◻

Thus, by setting \(n=j\), and \(r=-t+\frac{k}{2} -1\), and \(m=k-1\) into Proposition [prop:binomial-decomposition] yields central decomposition identity.

Corollary 16 (Central binomial decomposition). For integers \(j,t,k \geq 0\), \[\begin{align*} j \binom{j-t+\frac{k}{2} -1}{k-1} = k \binom{j-t+\frac{k}{2}-1}{k} + \left [t+\frac{k}{2} \right ] \binom{j-t+\frac{k}{2}-1}{k-1}. \end{align*}\]

Proof. By binomial decomposition [prop:binomial-decomposition], we have, \[\begin{align*} j \tbinom{j-t+\frac{k}{2} -1}{k-1} &= (k-1+1) \tbinom{j-t+\frac{k}{2} -1}{k-1+1} - \left [-t+\tfrac{k}{2} -1-(k-1)\right ] \tbinom{j-t+\frac{k}{2} -1}{k-1} \\ &= k \tbinom{j-t+\frac{k}{2}-1}{k} - \left [-t-\tfrac{k}{2} \right ] \tbinom{j-t+\tfrac{k}{2}-1}{k-1} \\ &= k \tbinom{j-t+\tfrac{k}{2}-1}{k} + \left [t+\tfrac{k}{2} \right ] \tbinom{j-t+\tfrac{k}{2}-1}{k-1}. \end{align*}\] This completes the proof. ◻

Thus, we have the relation for centered sums of powers, \[\begin{align*} \Sigma^{1}\,{n}^{m} &= \sum_{j=1}^{n} t^m + \sum_{k=1}^{m} \frac{\delta^{k} t^m}{k} \Bigg [ \sum_{j=1}^{n} \left \{ k \binom{j-t+\frac{k}{2}-1}{k} + \left [t+\frac{k}{2} \right ] \binom{j-t+\frac{k}{2}-1}{k-1} \right \} \\ &- t \sum_{j=1}^{n} \binom{j-t+\frac{k}{2}-1}{k-1} \Bigg ]. \end{align*}\] By rearranging it, we get, \[\begin{align*} \Sigma^{1}\,{n}^{m} &= \sum_{j=1}^{n} t^m + \sum_{k=1}^{m} \frac{\delta^{k} t^m}{k} \Bigg [ \left \{ k \sum_{j=1}^{n} \binom{j-t+\frac{k}{2}-1}{k} + \left [t+\frac{k}{2} \right ] \sum_{j=1}^n \binom{j-t+\frac{k}{2}-1}{k-1} \right \} \\ &- t \sum_{j=1}^{n} \binom{j-t+\frac{k}{2}-1}{k-1} \Bigg ] \\ &= \sum_{j=1}^{n} t^m + \sum_{k=1}^{m} \frac{\delta^{k} t^m}{k} \Bigg [ k \sum_{j=1}^{n} \binom{j-t+\frac{k}{2}-1}{k} + \frac{k}{2} \sum_{j=1}^n \binom{j-t+\frac{k}{2}-1}{k-1} \Bigg ]. \end{align*}\] Therefore, formula for centered sums of powers follows.

Proposition 17 (Centered decomposition of power sums). For integers \(m,n \geq 0\), and an arbitrary integer \(t\), \[\begin{align*} \Sigma^{1}\,{n}^{m} = \sum_{j=1}^{n} t^m + \sum_{k=1}^{m} \delta^{k} t^m \left [ \sum_{j=1}^{n} \binom{j-t+\frac{k}{2}-1}{k} + \frac{1}{2} \sum_{j=1}^n \binom{j-t+\frac{k}{2}-1}{k-1} \right ]. \end{align*}\]

Let us recall generalized hockey stick identity. That is,

Proposition 18 (Generalized hockey-stick identity). For integers \(a,b\) and \(j\), \[\begin{align*} \sum_{k=a}^{b} \binom{k}{j} = \binom{b+1}{j+1} - \binom{a}{j+1}. \end{align*}\]

Proof. We have, \(\sum_{k=a}^{b} \binom{k}{j} = \binom{a}{j} + \binom{a+1}{j} + \cdots + \binom{b}{j}\), which means that, \(\sum_{k=a}^{b} \binom{k}{j} = \left( \sum_{k=0}^{b} \binom{k}{j} \right) - \left( \sum_{k=0}^{a-1} \binom{k}{j} \right)\). By hockey stick identity \(\sum_{k=0}^{n} \binom{k}{j} = \binom{n+1}{j+1}\) yields, \[\begin{align*} \mathop{\textstyle\sum}_{k=a}^{b} \tbinom{k}{j} = \left( \mathop{\textstyle\sum}_{k=0}^{b} \binom{k}{j} \right) - \left( \mathop{\textstyle\sum}_{k=0}^{a-1} \tbinom{k}{j} \right) = \tbinom{b+1}{j+1} - \tbinom{a}{j+1}. \end{align*}\] This completes the proof. ◻

Therefore, by setting \(a=-t+\frac{k}{2}\) and \(b=n-t-\frac{k}{2}-1\) yields

Proposition 19 (Centered hockey stick identity). For integers \(n, j, t, k\), \[\begin{align*} \sum_{j=1}^{n} \binom{j-t+\frac{k}{2}-1}{k} = \sum_{a=-t+\frac{k}{2}}^{n-t-\frac{k}{2}-1} \binom{a}{k} = \binom{n-t+\frac{k}{2}}{k+1} - \binom{-t+\frac{k}{2}}{k+1} \end{align*}\]

Thus, closed form of centered sums of powers yields

Theorem 20 (Closed form of centered sums of powers). For integers \(n\geq 0, \; m \geq 0\), and arbitrary integer \(t\), \[\begin{align*} \Sigma^{1}\,{n}^{m} &= \sum_{j=1}^{n} t^m \\ &+ \sum_{k=1}^{m} \delta^{k} t^m \Bigg [ \left( \binom{n-t+\frac{k}{2}}{k+1} - \binom{-t+\frac{k}{2}}{k+1} \right) + \frac{1}{2} \left( \binom{n-t+\frac{k}{2}}{k} - \binom{-t+\frac{k}{2}}{k} \right) \Bigg ]. \end{align*}\]

Let \(a=n-t+\frac{k}{2}\), then, \[\begin{align*} &\left( \binom{a}{k+1} - \binom{a-n}{k+1} \right) + \frac{1}{2} \left( \binom{a}{k} - \binom{a-n}{k} \right) \\ &=\left( \binom{a}{k+1} - \binom{a-n}{k+1} + \frac{1}{2} \binom{a}{k} - \frac{1}{2} \binom{a-n}{k} \right) \\ &=\frac{1}{2} \left( 2 \binom{a}{k+1} - 2 \binom{a-n}{k+1} + \binom{a}{k} - \binom{a-n}{k} \right) \\ &=\frac{1}{2} \left( \binom{a}{k+1} + \binom{a}{k+1} - \binom{a-n}{k+1} - \binom{a-n}{k+1} + \binom{a}{k} - \binom{a-n}{k} \right). \end{align*}\] By binomial recurrence \(\binom{a+1}{k+1} = \binom{a}{k} + \binom{a}{k+1}\) \[\begin{align*} &\frac{1}{2} \left( \binom{a}{k+1} + \binom{a}{k+1} - \binom{a-n}{k+1} - \binom{a-n}{k+1} + \binom{a}{k} - \binom{a-n}{k} \right) \\ &= \frac{1}{2} \left( \left[ \binom{a}{k+1} + \binom{a}{k} \right] + \binom{a}{k+1} - \binom{a-n}{k+1} - \left[ \binom{a-n}{k+1} - \binom{a-n}{k} \right] \right) \\ &= \frac{1}{2} \left( \binom{a+1}{k+1} + \binom{a}{k+1} - \binom{a-n}{k+1} - \binom{a-n+1}{k+1} \right) \\ &= \frac{1}{2} \left( \left[ \binom{a+1}{k+1} + \binom{a}{k+1} \right] - \left[ \binom{a-n}{k+1} + \binom{a-n+1}{k+1} \right] \right) \end{align*}\] Therefore, by setting \(a=n-t+\frac{k}{2}\), we get simplified formula for centered sum of powers.

Proposition 21 (Simplified centered sums of powers). For integers \(n\geq 0, \; m \geq 0\), and an arbitrary integer \(t\) \[\begin{align*} \Sigma^{1}\,{n}^{m} &= \sum_{j=1}^{n} t^m \\ &+ \sum_{k=1}^{m} \frac{\delta^{k} t^m}{2} \left[ \left( \binom{n-t+\frac{k}{2}+1}{k+1} + \binom{n-t+\frac{k}{2}}{k+1} \right) - \left( \binom{-t+\frac{k}{2}}{k+1} + \binom{-t+\frac{k}{2}+1}{k+1} \right) \right] \end{align*}\]

Continuing similarly, we can derive formulas for multifold sums of powers by using centered hockey stick identity [prop:centered-hockey-stick-identity] repeatedly. For instance, for double sums of powers, we have \[\begin{align*} \Sigma^{2}\,{n}^{m} &= t^m \Sigma^{2}\,{n}^{0} \\ &+ \sum_{k=1}^{m} \frac{\delta^{k} t^m}{2} \Bigg[ \sum_{j=1}^{n} \left( \binom{j-t+\frac{k}{2}+1}{k+1} + \binom{j-t+\frac{k}{2}}{k+1} \right) \\ &- \left( \binom{-t+\frac{k}{2}}{k+1} \Sigma^{1}\,{n}^{0} + \binom{-t+\frac{k}{2}+1}{k+1} \Sigma^{1}\,{n}^{0} \right) \Bigg] \end{align*}\] Thus, by generalized hockey stick identity [prop:generalized-hockey-stick-identity] \[\begin{align*} \sum_{j=1}^{n} \binom{j-t+\frac{k}{2}+1}{k+1} &= \binom{n-t+\frac{k}{2} + 2}{k+2} - \binom{-t+\frac{k}{2}+2}{k+2} \\ \sum_{j=1}^{n} \binom{j-t+\frac{k}{2}}{k+1} &= \binom{n-t+\frac{k}{2} + 1}{k+2} - \binom{-t+\frac{k}{2}+1}{k+2} \end{align*}\] By substituting closed forms above, we get \[\begin{align*} \Sigma^{2}\,{n}^{m} &= t^m \Sigma^{2}\,{n}^{0} \\ &+ \sum_{k=1}^{m} \frac{\delta^{k} t^m}{2} \Bigg \{ \left[ \binom{n-t+\frac{k}{2} + 2}{k+2} - \binom{-t+\frac{k}{2}+2}{k+2} \right] \\ &+ \left[ \binom{n-t+\frac{k}{2} + 1}{k+2} - \binom{-t+\frac{k}{2}+1}{k+2} \right] \\ &- \left[ \binom{-t+\frac{k}{2}}{k+1} \Sigma^{1}\,{n}^{0} + \binom{-t+\frac{k}{2}+1}{k+1} \Sigma^{1}\,{n}^{0} \right] \Bigg \} \end{align*}\] By combining the common terms yields \[\begin{align*} \Sigma^{2}\,{n}^{m} &= t^m \Sigma^{2}\,{n}^{0} + \sum_{k=1}^{m} \frac{\delta^{k} t^m}{2} \Bigg \{ \left[ \binom{n-t+\frac{k}{2} + 2}{k+2} + \binom{n-t+\frac{k}{2} + 1}{k+2} \right] \\ &- \left[ \binom{-t+\frac{k}{2}+2}{k+2} \Sigma^{0}\,{n}^{0} + \binom{-t+\frac{k}{2} + 1}{k+2} \Sigma^{0}\,{n}^{0} \right] \\ &- \left[ \binom{-t+\frac{k}{2}+1}{k+1} \Sigma^{1}\,{n}^{0} + \binom{-t+\frac{k}{2}+0}{k+1} \Sigma^{1}\,{n}^{0} \right] \Bigg \} \end{align*}\] Thus, formula for double centered sums of powers follows

Proposition 22 (Double centered sums of powers). For integers \(n\geq 0, \; m \geq 0\), and an arbitrary integer \(t\) \[\begin{align*} \Sigma^{2}\,{n}^{m} &= t^m \Sigma^{2}\,{n}^{0} + \sum_{k=1}^{m} \frac{\delta^{k} t^m}{2} \Bigg \{ \left[ \binom{n-t+\frac{k}{2} + 2}{k+2} + \binom{n-t+\frac{k}{2} + 1}{k+2} \right] \\ &- \left[ \binom{-t+\frac{k}{2}+2}{k+2} + \binom{-t+\frac{k}{2} + 1}{k+2} \right] \Sigma^{0}\,{n}^{0} \\ &- \left[ \binom{-t+\frac{k}{2}+1}{k+1} + \binom{-t+\frac{k}{2}+0}{k+1} \right] \Sigma^{1}\,{n}^{0} \Bigg \}. \end{align*}\]

Therefore, by continuing similarly, we can derive formula for \(r-\)fold sums of powers by using centered hockey stick identity [prop:centered-hockey-stick-identity] repeatedly. We have

Theorem 23 (Multifold centered sums of powers). For integers \(n\geq 0, \; m \geq 0\), and an arbitrary integer \(t\) \[\begin{align*} \Sigma^{r}\,{n}^{m} &= t^m \Sigma^{r}\,{n}^{0} + \sum_{k=1}^{m} \frac{\delta^{k} t^{m}}{2} \Bigg \{ \left[ \binom{n-t+\frac{k}{2}+r}{k+r} + \binom{n-t+\frac{k}{2}+r-1}{k+r} \right] \\ &- \sum_{s=0}^{r-1} \left[ \binom{-t+\frac{k}{2} + r -s}{k+r-s} + \binom{-t+\frac{k}{2} + r -s-1}{k+r-s} \right] \Sigma^{s}\,{n}^{0} \Bigg \}. \end{align*}\]

Now we notice that

Proposition 24 (Multifold sum of zero powers). For integers \(r \geq 0\) and \(n\geq 1\) \[\begin{align*} \Sigma^{r}\,{n}^{0} = \binom{r+n-1}{r} \end{align*}\]

Proof.

  1. Let \(r=0\), then \(\Sigma^{0}\,{n}^{0}=n^0=\binom{n-1}{0} = 1\), by definition [prop:multifold-sums-of-powers-recurrence].

  2. Let \(r=1\), then \(\Sigma^{1}\,{n}^{0} = \sum_{k=1}^{n} \binom{k-1}{0} = \sum_{k=1}^{n} 1 = \binom{n}{1}\).

  3. Let \(r=2\), then \(\Sigma^{2}\,{n}^{0}= \sum_{k=1}^{n} \binom{k}{1} = \sum_{k=1}^{n} k = \binom{n+1}{2}\).

  4. Let \(r=3\), then \(\Sigma^{3}\,{n}^{0} = \sum_{k=1}^{n} \binom{k+1}{2} = \binom{n+2}{3}\).

  5. By induction over \(r\) and hockey stick identity \(\sum_{k=r}^{n} \binom{k}{r} = \binom{n+1}{r+1}\), the claim follows \(\Sigma^{r}\,{n}^{0} = \binom{r+n-1}{r}\).

 ◻

Hence, by [theorem:multifold-centered-sums-of-powers] and [prop:multifold-sum-of-zero-powers], binomial form of multifold sums of powers follows

Proposition 25 (Binomial form of multifold centered sums of powers). For integers \(n\geq 0, \; m \geq 0\), and an arbitrary integer \(t\) \[\begin{align*} \Sigma^{r}\,{n}^{m} &= \binom{r+n-1}{r} t^m + \sum_{k=1}^{m} \frac{\delta^{k} t^{m}}{2} \Bigg \{ \left[ \binom{n-t+\frac{k}{2}+r}{k+r} + \binom{n-t+\frac{k}{2}+r-1}{k+r} \right] \\ &- \sum_{s=0}^{r-1} \left[ \binom{-t+\frac{k}{2} + r -s}{k+r-s} + \binom{-t+\frac{k}{2} + r -s-1}{k+r-s} \right] \binom{s+n-1}{s} \Bigg \}. \end{align*}\]

We may observe another remarkable result, by setting \(t \rightarrow -t\) into formula above

Proposition 26 (Negated binomial centered sums of powers). For integers \(n\geq 0, \; m \geq 0\), and an arbitrary integer \(t\) \[\begin{align*} \Sigma^{r}\,{n}^{m} &= (-1)^{m} \binom{r+n-1}{r} t^m \\ &+ (-1)^{m}\sum_{k=1}^{m} \frac{(-1)^{k} \delta^{k} t^{m}}{2} \Bigg \{ \left[ \binom{n+t+\frac{k}{2}+r}{k+r} + \binom{n+t+\frac{k}{2}+r-1}{k+r} \right] \\ &- \sum_{s=0}^{r-1} \left[ \binom{t+\frac{k}{2} + r -s}{k+r-s} + \binom{t+\frac{k}{2} + r -s-1}{k+r-s} \right] \binom{s+n-1}{s} \Bigg \}. \end{align*}\]

Proof. We have \(\delta^{k} (-t)^{m} = (-1)^{m+k} \delta^{k} t^{m}\), and \((-t)^{m} = (-1)^{m} t^{m}\). Hence claim follows from [prop:binomial-form-of-multifold-centered-sums-of-powers]. ◻

Conclusions

In this manuscript, we derive formulas for multifold sums of powers [theorem:multifold-centered-sums-of-powers], [prop:binomial-form-of-multifold-centered-sums-of-powers], [prop:negated-binomial-centered-sums-of-powers], and others, using Newton’s formula in central differences, evaluated at an arbitrary integer \(t\). We utilize hockey-stick identities for binomial coefficients, namely [prop:generalized-hockey-stick-identity] and [prop:centered-hockey-stick-identity], to compute closed forms of column sums of binomial coefficients. These closed forms are then used in the derivation of formulas for multifold sums of powers. Additionally, we show that Knuth’s formula for multifold sums of odd powers \(n^{2m-1}\) (Knuth, Donald E. 1993) arises naturally from Newton’s formula in central differences, evaluated at \(t=0\). All main results of this manuscript are validated using programs written in Wolfram Mathematica; see Section [sec:mathematica].

Mathematica programs

Use the Mathematica package (Kolosov, Petro 2025) to validate the results

Mathematica Function Validates / Prints
MultifoldSumOfPowersRecurrence[r, n, m] Computes \(\Sigma^{r}\,{n}^{m}\)
ValidateCentralFactorialsInTermsOfFalling[10] Validates Prop. [prop:central-factorials-in-terms-of-falling]
ValidateBinomialFormOfCentralFactorials[10] Validates Prop. [prop:binomial-form-of-central-factorials]
ValidateNewtonsFormulaForPowersInZero[20] Validates Prop. [prop:newtons-formula-for-powers-in-zero]
ValidateOrdinarySumsOfOddPowersInCentralDifferences[20] Validates Prop. [prop:ordinary-sums-of-odd-powers-in-central-differences]
ValidateMultifoldSumsOfOddPowersInCentralDifferences[5] Validates Thm. [theorem:multifold-sums-of-odd-powers-in-central-differences]
ValidateNewtonsFormulaForPowers[10] Validates Prop. [prop:newtons-formula-for-powers]
ValidatePowersInCentralBinomialForm[10] Validates Prop. [prop:powers-in-central-binomial-form]
ValidateCenteredOrdinarySumsOfPowers[10] Validates Cor. [cor:centered-ordinary-sums-of-powers]
ValidateBinomialDecomposition[5] Validates Prop. [prop:binomial-decomposition]
ValidateCentralBinomialDecomposition[5] Validates Cor. [cor:central-binomial-decomposition]
ValidateCenteredDecompositionOfPowerSums[10] Validates Prop. [prop:centered-decomposition-of-power-sums]
ValidateCenteredHockeyStickIdentity[10] Validates Prop. [prop:centered-hockey-stick-identity]
ValidateCenteredHockeyStickIdentity[10] Validates Prop. [prop:centered-hockey-stick-identity]
ValidateClosedFormOfCenteredSumsOfPowers[10] Validates Thm. [theorem:closed-form-of-centered-sums-of-powers]
ValidateSimplifiedCenteredSumsOfPowers[10] Validates Prop. [prop:simplified-centered-sums-of-powers]
ValidateDoubleCenteredSumsOfPowers[10] Validates Prop. [prop:double-centered-sums-of-powers]
Mathematica Function Validates / Prints
ValidateMultifoldCenteredSumsOfPowers[5] Validates Theorem [theorem:multifold-centered-sums-of-powers]
ValidateMultifoldSumOfZeroPowers[10] Validates Proposition [prop:multifold-sum-of-zero-powers]
ValidateBinomialMultifoldCenteredSumsOfPowers[5] Validates Proposition [prop:binomial-form-of-multifold-centered-sums-of-powers]
ValidateNegatedBinomialCenteredSumOfPowers[5] Validates Proposition [prop:negated-binomial-centered-sums-of-powers]

Metadata

Butzer, Paul Leo, K. Schmidt, E. L. Stark, and L. Vogt. 1989. “Central Factorial Numbers; Their Main Properties and Some Applications.” Numerical Functional Analysis and Optimization 10 (5-6): 419–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/01630568908816313.
Carlitz, L., and John Riordan. 1963. “The Divided Central Differences of Zero.” Canadian Journal of Mathematics 15: 94–100. https://doi.org/10.4153/CJM-1963-010-8.
Knuth, Donald E. 1993. Johann Faulhaber and sums of powers.” Mathematics of Computation 61 (203): 277–94. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/9207222.
Kolosov, Petro. 2025. Source code for Central Finite Differences and Newton Formula manuscript. Https://github.com/kolosovpetro/SumsOfPowersViaCentralFiniteDifferencesAndNewtonFormula.
Kolosov, Petro. 2026a. Newton’s Interpolation Formula and Sums of Powers. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18040979.
Kolosov, Petro. 2026b. Sums of Powers via Backward Finite Differences and Newton’s Formula. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18118011.
Newton, Isaac and Chittenden, N.W. 1850. Newton’s Principia: the mathematical principles of natural philosophy. Https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_KaAIAAAAIAAJ/page/466/mode/2up; New-York, D. Adee.
Riordan, John. 1968. Combinatorial Identities. Vol. 217. Https://www.amazon.com/-/de/Combinatorial-Identities-Probability-Mathematical-Statistics/dp/0471722758; Wiley New York.
Sloane, Neil J.A. and others. 2003. The on-line encyclopedia of integer sequences. Https://oeis.org/.
Steffensen, Johan Frederik. 1927. Interpolation. Https://www.amazon.com/-/de/Interpolation-Second-Dover-Books-Mathematics-ebook/dp/B00GHQVON8; Williams & Wilkins.

  1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18096789↩︎